In the Tank?

So let's get this straight: "The media" are swooning over Barack, love McCain but can't stand Hillary? Maybe it's a little more complicated than that.

Says Jerry Lindsley: "I hate to simplify this too much, but people are looking for a balanced presentation of ideas. They want two sides, if there are two sides. People think it's not that difficult to present both sides. Keep your personal biases at home."

To which Lichter has a three-word reply: Not gonna happen. Despite efforts to hold on to textbook notions of "objective" reporting, he says, journalistic norms have been in flux for several ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Jun 18, 2008 - 11:47 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Jun 19, 2008 - 1:37 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Richard Riehl
4.6
by Richard Riehl - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an excellent analysis of the charges of bias in the news. It was especially effective to include the close analysis of the news by the numbers of headlines, photos, positive and negative stories. I do think Lichter is right and that the genie is out of the bottle on news objectivity. To get balance will require editorial decisions to see that facts underpin opinions and that equal space is given to opposing views.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.5

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
4.6
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
4.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!