Pittsburgh on the Eve of the G-20 Summit

When President Obama announced that Pittsburgh would be the site of the upcoming G-20 summit, even Pittsburghers were surprised. Like a stunned and overcome beauty pageant winner, we honestly never dreamed we were in the running. Summits are held in international capitals like London or Helsinki, and while we understood that we weren't the first choice—for some reason, New York was booked—we were still puzzled, and a little worried. Were we really big ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Wall Street Journal (Most Emailed), NewsRack (Energy)

See All Reviews »

Review

Derek Hawkins
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 18, 2009

An excellent essay about Pittsburgh, written just ahead of the G-20 Summit, that reflects on how the city has changed in recent decades and the symbolism behind the president's choice of Pittsburgh for this international meeting. The selection of this formerly working-class town may represent a deep irony, depending on the results of the meeting. Very clever, highly original narrative.

The results of this G-20 could create little nascent Pittsburghs around the globe—places where workers will be paid a pittance to toil in unsafe conditions, polluting their backyards while making fortunes for would-be Andy Carnegies. Maybe, like us, they’ll get a nice library out of it. That’s the problem with symbolism. You begin innocently and then suddenly you’re tangled up in unintended meaning. I’m sure the president sees the G-20 as a reward for Pittsburgh’s support as well as a feel-good choice, championing the scrappy little guy, and the publicity it generates may change the image of Pittsburgh forever, which would be a good thing—for our pride, at least. What actually goes on behind those green doors at the convention center and how those policies change the world—and by extension, Pittsburgh—is something else entirely.

See All Reviews »

Derek's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.2
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »