How our government treats those prisoners is unjustifiable, even if every soul in Gitmo is guilty of being a terrorist/an enemy combatant/a war criminal. And that we'll likely have to wait eight months before someone decides to close Gitmo is itself a crime. Full Story »
Posted by Dwight Rousu
Although this is an opinion piece, and we expect some bias, Parvaz is not persuasive here to anyone but those who agree with her point and don't need any support for it. There is little in the way of facts or other evidence, and the evidence she does provide has many weaknesses (e.g. it comes from hearsay). Some of the information is confusing, such as the reference to "camps" that have varying rules. Do they all have the rules she mentions next? This column would benefit from a reorganization and a clearer statement of points with supporting information that follows.
