Veteran, vets' advocate: McCain's war posturing killing morale for troops

The "surge" is working, we are winning in Iraq, and it's "not too important" as to when the troops will be returning home, Senator and presidential hopeful John McCain (R-AZ) said this week.

Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), or McCain's "dog's body," as MSNBC's Keith Olbermann refers to him, portrayed McCain as a particular authority on the Iraq occupation based on his service in Vietnam.

McCain's potential position of power as ... Full Story »

Posted by Denise Clendening
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Politics
Topics: Iraq, John McCain
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Denise Clendening - Jun 12, 2008 - 6:13 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Jun 19, 2008 - 2:49 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Denise Clendening
3.9
by Denise Clendening - Oct. 1, 2008

Raw Story links with Keith Olbermann's interview with VoteVet Brandon Friedman, Vice Chairman of VoteVets and a veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. They make the point that because McCain is a veteran he should not be immune to criticism on his military position because he is not the only one to have suffered in wars. Interview is worth watching.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Robert Vermeers
2.6
by Robert Vermeers - Oct. 1, 2008

I graded this down because I definitely can understand a pro-McCain stance on this one. I can see why McCain, with his history of bravery, would say why it isn’t important for the troops to come home. He expects the troops to stay over there until “the job is done”. So, from his perspective he is absolutely correct to demand a high level of courage and commitment not worrying about when you come home but to stay and do your duty. If I had had this kind of commitment when I was in the military my years would have counted for something. All that being said when you discount the legitimacy of this invasion and occupation all this bravado is for naught. If the invasion and occupation were for a just cause then I could accept the ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Dwight Rousu
3.5
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

Not quite as incisive as some Olbermann stories, but does provide more than one viewpoint to the story. The equivalence of dropping bombs from 30,000 feet on victims you never see, to the experience of house to house combat and insurgent suppression where you see the suffering; that equivalence seems false. The piece never touches upon the immorality and illegality of the invasion and occupation, not the 1.4 million Iraqi dead and 5 million refugees.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Paul Peete
3.1
by Paul Peete - Oct. 1, 2008

This is plausibly the mindset of some Iraq multiple tour vets, but a balanced panel would have had the pro surge advocate and the article could have presented the view of some I've met who can't wait to get back to their unit to protect their friends.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has no journalistic merit. It repeats the hate attaqcks coming from the Obama camp, and completely ignores the context. Senator McCain pointed to the fact that we have troops stationed peacefully in Japan and Korea decades after the wars ended, and in Germany and elsewhere and said he hopes the same will happen in Iraq. Do these people really think the American people are so uneducated that they do not know this? Should not have been posted on newsTrust.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Facts
2.2
Fairness
3.0
Information
2.8
Sourcing
2.4
Style
2.8
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.6
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!