Harry Reid's Jimmy Carter Memorial Act: Senate takes up windfall profits tax

More gaseous demagoguery will be emitted on the Senate floor today as Harry Reid leads the crusade to impose a Jimmy Carter-era windfall profits tax on oil companies. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, Sci/Tech
Topics: Energy, Oil and Gas
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jun 10, 2008 - 8:37 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jack Dinkmeyer
3.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

A before-the-event article containing scant information. If Republicans carry through their threat to block the bill, it will be the second example in a week of Republicans refusing to allow Americans any benefit of their governance. Their usual “my way or no way” approach means the Sisters of Oil will not only continue to receive government subsidies, but also continue to reap $1,200 a-second profits. Amazingly, in an election year Republicans are pandering to special interests about an issue that’s incensed most Americans. An issue that takes a big bite out of their budgets. Do Republicans have a death wish? .

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Michael Nolan
1.1
by Michael Nolan - Oct. 1, 2008

Rather than trying to report fairly, the author uses loaded words ("whining about GOP obstruction") to push her private, neo-con agenda.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
2.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Sharon McIntosh
3.1
by Sharon McIntosh - Oct. 1, 2008

First you say you do and then you don't, baby what do you want to do? Lyrics form a 1940's vintage, but topical now. The decision here is all partisan, the democrats voted "yae" and the repub's voted "nay". Those taxes would most surely help an ailing economy. The taxpayers cannot keep throwing their money at corporate America.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Clint Hardesty
1.0
by Clint Hardesty - Oct. 1, 2008

This is horrible, even by right-wing blog standards. It's a descriptive rant that is very light on the "descriptive".

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.1

Poor
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
2.5
Information
2.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
2.1
Recommendation
2.3
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!