I am the Managing Editor of the publication. However, Dana does an excellent job at exploring the new anti-choice Democrats, what kinds of policies they support and what they can - and can't- accomplish for Democratic and pro-choice politics.

I'm an editor at the publication, too. But even so, I think I can objectively say that this is a very thought-provoking and nuanced piece. Dana's arguing that in the long-run, merely having Dems, even anti-choice electeds, *in historically Republican districts* is advantageous for reproductive rights. This is certainly something the Democratic Party as a whole, and reproductive rights activists, need to think about.