So What Does John McCain Think of the President's Constitutional Authority to Violate FISA?

If one examines the entire series of statements, it soon becomes evident either that the Senator and his staff have no earthly idea what they're talking about or (more likely) that they are quite deliberately being as ambiguous, equivocal and contradictory as possible, so that they can embrace whichever view is politically expedient at any given time and with any given audience -- so that they can, for example, tell Charlie Savage that the President has no ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Michael Evelyn
3.6
by Michael Evelyn - Oct. 1, 2008

More learned writers clearly prefer to avoid using the term flip-flop and wish to debate the changing positions McCain has taken on FISA and Article II authority as a matter of divining what McCain thinks. This article is an attempt to do just that. However after writing at some length about the constitutional arguments and court rulings swirling around the issue, the author sums up his frustration with McCains thinking as "so internally inconsistent". That one explanation offered for this obfuscation is that - it's a deliberate ploy by McCain's campaign in order to avoid alienating any group in the way of true politican posturing - is not I would suggest a very smart campaign strategy. The article implies that this writer has given up trying to figure out what McCain really thinks but the ever increasing articles on the subject indicates that reporters have not.

See All Reviews »

Michael's Rating

Overall
3.6

Good
from 7 answers
Quality
3.5
Fairness
5.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »