So What Does John McCain Think of the President's Constitutional Authority to Violate FISA?

If one examines the entire series of statements, it soon becomes evident either that the Senator and his staff have no earthly idea what they're talking about or (more likely) that they are quite deliberately being as ambiguous, equivocal and contradictory as possible, so that they can embrace whichever view is politically expedient at any given time and with any given audience -- so that they can, for example, tell Charlie Savage that the President has no ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jun 9, 2008 - 9:17 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Randy Morrow
4.0
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 1, 2008

This post looks at the McCain's campaign's apparent flip-flops on Presidential authority to ignore FISA.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Michael Evelyn
3.6
by Michael Evelyn - Oct. 1, 2008

More learned writers clearly prefer to avoid using the term flip-flop and wish to debate the changing positions McCain has taken on FISA and Article II authority as a matter of divining what McCain thinks. This article is an attempt to do just that. However after writing at some length about the constitutional arguments and court rulings swirling around the issue, the author sums up his frustration with McCains thinking as "so internally inconsistent". That one explanation offered for this obfuscation is that - it's a deliberate ploy by McCain's campaign in order to avoid alienating any group in the way of true politican posturing - is not I would suggest a very smart campaign strategy. The article implies that this writer has ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jim Martin
4.9
by Jim Martin - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an opinion piece, and whether I like what it says or not, it does include point of fact and analysis there of. Most of the piece is fact rather than opinion. It is informative, fair, and very much in context. Well written.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.2
Style
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.8
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!