'We Should Not Let Them Back into Polite Society'

Richard Clarke on GWB and His Cronies

In his conclusion, Richard Clarke made a startling assertion that I happen to agree with. When asked about repercussions for those who lied, he said that at a minimum, "We should not allow these people back into polite society and give them jobs on university boards and corporate boards and just pretend that nothing happened when there are over 4,000 Americans dead and over 25,000 Americans grievously wounded. They'll carry those wounds and suffer all ... Full Story »

Posted by Stephen Pizzo

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.7
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008

Coming from a guy like Clarke, this matters. If Congress, the courts, the international community won't hold members of the Bush administration accountable for their behavior in office, then the responsibility falls on the rest of the country. I think we should expect more statements like this as Bush's final term winds down. To put this in a greater context, check out Sheryl Gay Stolberg's "Bush in the background," which appeared today in the New York Times.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Mike Kovanda
5.0
by Mike Kovanda - Oct. 1, 2008

fantastic article, one a a few that speak to the crimes that have been committed in the last 8 yrs.My biggest concern with McCain and his fellow repubs.(some democrats as well) is their failure to speak out regarding war crimes,tampering (justice dept.) habeas corpus,etc. Corageous article ,spot on. Many questions McCain needs to address were posed.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Douglas Hord
1.3
by Douglas Hord - Oct. 1, 2008

Hey, my hometown paper hits on one! You know this is the largest paper in the country that's never won a Pulitzer, right? Of course, this is a BLOG on the Chron's website, not an article supported by their editorial staff. Figures. So, this is parroting what KO had to say on his program the night before, followed with "Impeachment is what GWB and Cheney deserved at the minimum." Oooooh, brave and earth shaking journalism indeed. I think the Chron is safe from needing the shelf space for that Pulitzer again this year.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Stephen Pizzo
4.6
by Stephen Pizzo - Oct. 1, 2008

Increasingly people are looking towards the end of the Bush administration and wondering, some right out loud, whether anyone is going to pursue the alleged misdeeds committed by or ordered by high administration officials. Richard Clark, former national security adviser, has been an administration critic since leaving his White House post four years ago. His statement on MSNBC last night may be just the beginning of more to come.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Mary Determann
2.6
by Mary Determann - Oct. 1, 2008

It appears that major background information is required and perhaps it is necessary to cite the website of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence website: http://intelligence.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=298775

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Randy Morrow
3.5
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 1, 2008

If you missed Richard Clarke's 6.5.08 appearance on "Countdown" you can catch it in this post along with comments by the poster.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
3.6
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

A good start on what should become a national movement. Still, not allowing The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse--Cheney The Despot, Rove The Falsifier, Rumsfeld The Warlord, and Bush The Inferior--into polite society is akin to a slap on the wrist. Surely after eight years in which every major policy and action of this administration has benefitted only special interests and the ultra rich to the extreme detriment of America and Americans, we can come up with something better. How about waterboarding? They seemed to like that. Or the euphemism that's so popular with the Four Horsemen--"extreme interrogation."

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.4
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. The author does not consult any sources, only Richard Clarke, who has been thoroughly discredited. The is no historical context. He is ignorant of past wars. He is ignorant about Saddam Hussein.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Eric Yendall
5.0
by Eric Yendall - Oct. 1, 2008

Obviously I agree with the article and the statement of Richard Clarke. A national consumer boycott of any firms taking on members of the Bush gang as consultants, advisers or Board members should be instituted.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Armand Fontaine
4.7
by Armand Fontaine - Oct. 1, 2008

Well done piece. There is substantial sourcing and substantial backgraound to this story. The video makes great backdrop to the story.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 18 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
2.6
Fairness
3.7
Information
3.8
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.2
Accuracy
2.5
Balance
2.4
Context
3.7
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.9
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!