Media Blindly Pick Up McCain's Talking Point That Town Hall Meetings Are His 'Strength,' 'He's At His Best'

Today, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) sent a letter to invite Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) to join him "in participating in town hall meetings across the country to discuss the most important issues facing Americans." Later today, McCain told reporters that he "prefer[s]" town hall style discussions, saying he "would never have been able to win in New Hampshire if we hadn't have conducted 102 town hall meetings."

After learning of the proposal, media figures ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Business, Media
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Media and Politics, John McCain
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Jun 4, 2008 - 3:32 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Peter McManus
2.7
by Peter McManus - Oct. 1, 2008

The author accuses the media of blindly accepting McCain's talking points. Maybe. Maybe they just disagree with the author? The basic idea, "let's see if we believe McCain is good in town hall gatherings", was good.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Berta S McDonnell
3.3
by Berta S McDonnell - Oct. 1, 2008

This article does a good job in pointing out McCains weakeness as a public speaker. The fact that he is best in town hall meetings, does not mean that he is good at it. He is just really bad at large venue speeches where he can barely keep the audiences attention. Next to Barack, he will always seem dull. I also agree the media could use a little more discernment rather than just serving as messengers at times. They could have quoted him instead. It was nice getting a chuckle going down the gaffe memory lane...

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Carol Winograd
3.8
by Carol Winograd - Oct. 1, 2008

we need more articles like this to point out who the real McCain is and how the media ignore his more egregious staements

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.3
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
2.7
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!