John McCain: U.S. committed to preventing a second Holocaust

Here is an interesting question for the Jewish American voter: Would you prefer a candidate that said Jewish author Philip Roth "affected the formation of my sensibility" or the candidate that is "not a big fan" of Roth, and prefers other Jewish writers, such as Victor Frankl, whose book "Man's Search for Meaning" is "one of the most substantial things I've read in my life." Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jun 3, 2008 - 9:37 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Evan Derkacz
2.1
by Evan Derkacz - Oct. 1, 2008

There's no there there. This is a news blurb that could've been generated by computer software.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Max Blum
3.1
by Max Blum - Oct. 1, 2008

Informative, with some insightful observations. But, Rosner does not elaborate; he does not make the logical connections and explanations required for an average reader to understand the subject's statements and what Rosner says about them. One instance: 'Here, a clear line can be drawn between McCain's answer and Roth's successful novel "The Plot Against America" ...' How, please?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Clint Hardesty
1.3
by Clint Hardesty - Oct. 1, 2008

There is no real substance to this piece. What's more, neither candidate's positions on Iran are presented or analyzed. Of course, while there is a subtle misframing of Senator Obama's willingness to diplomatically engage Iran, that presents this as some sort of "gaffe", there is no mentioning of McCain's statements demonstrating his lack of understanding of Iranian govt. structure (i.e. his statements about Pres. Ahmenijad being the most important and powerful policy maker).

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.7

Average
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.6
Fairness
3.2
Information
2.4
Sourcing
2.6
Context
2.6
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
2.7
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!