Sandra Day O'Connor: Stop Electing Judges

Multimillion-dollar judicial campaigns make it difficult to know whether a judge is deciding a case based on the merits or on concerns about reelection, she said.
She noted that the founders of the country believed it crucially important that federal judges have the freedom to make unpopular decisions without worrying about poll numbers. It was only after President Andrew Jackson's election in 1828 that he persuaded states to begin adopting elections ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Member Tags: Judicial Branch, Judicial Elections
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Sep 15, 2009 - 1:23 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Sep 15, 2009 - 1:23 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.5
by Dwight Rousu - Sep. 15, 2009

O'Connor highlights a major problem of rich corporations buying offices for judges. She omits the problem of them buying legislators and executives, and omits the solution of publicly financed elections. Johnson reports the conference adequately.

As a judge who appointed George W. Bush president with tortured legal illogic, O'Connor has intimate exposure to ways in which judges are influenced by who puts them in office.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.5
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.5
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!