The Price of the Surge

The surge has changed the situation not by itself but only in conjunction with several other developments: the grim successes of ethnic cleansing, the tactical quiescence of the Shiite militias, and a series of deals between U.S. forces and Sunni tribes that constitute a new bottom-up approach to pacifying Iraq. The problem is that this strategy to reduce violence is not linked to any sustainable plan for building a viable Iraqi state. If anything, it has ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Topics: Iraq, War in Iraq
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - May 26, 2008 - 3:35 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.2
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

This six-page article cannot be termed a summary; however, it contains excellent must-read information. It makes a strong point that the surge, so prized by ultra conservatives and their unfavorite candidate McCain, isn't really responsible for the reduction in violence. If anything, "this strategy to reduce violence is not linked to any sustainable plan for building a viable Iraqi state." Even with other factors, the surge cannot succeed in the long run because it was a reaction, not a plan. The author finally finishes with intelligent recommendations about how to reconcile Iraq--such as involving the UN, much to the chagrin of ultra conservatives--when America leaves after a hundred years.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

A long, but critical read on the War in Iraq. The author, who clearly has vast knowledge about the region, convincingly argues that the surge is stoking tribal and sectarian divisions that will undermine strong, stable Iraqi state.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
M. Simon
2.9
by M. Simon - Oct. 1, 2008

The article is interesting but overlooks many points. Army retention is above requirements. Doubts about Maliki were erased with his attacks (against American advice) on Shia militias. He mistakes short term retribalization necessary for security for the long term effort of Iraqi unity through fair elections and economic growth (which is currently 5% a year without Saudi help). He also fails to mention that the Basra situation was caused by British policy of "no casualties". All in all too much politics, not enough economics. And certain fatal blind spots (the British rules of engagement and tactics in Basra). The article is good at highlighting problems, poor at focusing on opportunities.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Salam Adil
3.6
by Salam Adil - Oct. 1, 2008

A well researched piece that covers the topic from a broad range of angles. But it suffers from being too timid in its recommendations and will be destined to be another in a long line of articles from this esteemed publication that skirts around the issues but but never makes any real difference.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Ron Breedlove
5.0
by Ron Breedlove - Oct. 1, 2008

Very informative, and well researched.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Terry Mazanec
3.5
by Terry Mazanec - Oct. 1, 2008

Thorough, well-researched story that includes suggestions for the next phase of the Iraq war. Some speculation may be unjustified as to the consequences of various policies, but the speculation is largely identified as such.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.6
Information
4.6
Sourcing
3.9
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.3
Balance
2.2
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!