Sick and Wrong

How Washington is screwing up health care reform – and why it may take a revolt to fix it

The president and the Democrats decided not to press for the only plan that makes sense for everyone, in order to preserve an industry that is not only cruel and stupid and dysfunctional, but through its rank inefficiency has necessitated the very reforms now being debated. Full Story »

Posted by Randy Morrow
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Health
Topics: Health Care
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Randy Morrow - Sep 14, 2009 - 12:41 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Randy Morrow - Sep 14, 2009 - 12:41 AM PDT
Randy Morrow
4.6
by Randy Morrow - Sep. 15, 2009

Mr. Taibbi explains why no meaningful health care reform will be passed.

For what its worth, this is without a doubt the most informative article on health care politics I have read to date.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Sep. 18, 2009

Taibbi employs his colorfully phrased no-bullshit analysis of the disasterous conjunction of health care legislation, and a congress badly in need of mental health care. A very excellent, though somewhat depressing, read.

Bury the bogus Baucus BS bill, and put in single payer.

Without a public option, any effort at health care reform will be as meaningful as a manicure for a gunshot victim. More »

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Fred Gatlin
1.8
by Fred Gatlin - Sep. 15, 2009

This is a very long commentary that is lacking in facts. The author sees the public option as the only real reform. However, provides no proof and fails to calmly address others concern. He is wrong that public option is the only way to go. He needs to read David Goldhill's article in the September Atlantic.

Mr. Taibbi's shrillness is an example of the inability to compromise of supporters of the public option.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.4
by Barry Grossheim - Sep. 15, 2009

It is nice to have my own cynicism justified by a third party!

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Harry A Farr
4.8
by Harry A Farr - Sep. 15, 2009

That Mr Taibbi is correct is obvious to anyone whose income does not depend on the insurance industry.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Merida
5.0
by Merida - Sep. 15, 2009

Yes, it presents a very appropriate point of view of how the healthcare system is managed and has been handled until now.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 8 reviews (46% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.1
Style
4.0
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.8
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
3.8
Expertise
2.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.1
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Snowe says Obama should scrap the public option to pass bill

    Key senators said Sunday the "public option" favored by House Democrats for healthcare is all but dead, but a pivotal Republican said it's not dead ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • With a Health Care Plan This Insane, Who Needs Wingnuts?

    There's one positive political aspect to this epic fight for healthcare reform. We now know for sure which congressional Democrats have to be vigorously challenged...
    Posted by Dwight Rousu