Clean Water Laws Are Neglected, at a Cost to Health

In the past five years, companies and workplaces have violated pollution laws more than 500,000 times. But the vast majority of polluters have escaped punishment. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via MuckRack, OneRiot, Nicholas Kristof, Jay Rosen, Tom Friedman, New York Times (Most Emailed)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Sci/Tech, Health
Stats Help
# Diggs: 1 (as of 2009-09-12)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Sep 12, 2009 - 2:15 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Sep 13, 2009 - 3:18 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Sep. 13, 2009

Outstanding investigation of water pollution in the U.S. This in-depth report is based on extensive research, documents hundreds of violations of the EPA's Clean Water Act, cites many authoritative sources, and provides much-needed context on this important public issue.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.3
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 18, 2009

This in-depth Times investigation combines the human stories of the toll of polluted water, with exhaustive research into violations of the Clean Water Act across the country. Recommended read.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Patricia Blochowiak
3.3
by Patricia Blochowiak - Sep. 18, 2009

Good general story with lots of general examples, but few specific details. For example, "get sick right away" vs. "accumulate for years or decades before they cause problems." "Records analyzed by The Times" - which records? Even the local information link does not provide specific information about the types or quantities of pollutants, only the number of violations without information about the type or degree of the problem.

It's useful for people to know that water quality is a problem, but it would be more useful to mention what can be done, such as having water tested, filtering water, contacting legislators (which level of government is responsible?) and avoiding pesticide and triclosan use.

See Full Review » (20 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (60% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.2
Style
3.5
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
4.0
Context
3.5
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.2
Expertise
3.5
Originality
3.5
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
3.5
Responsibility
4.5
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
4.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!