Can Israel survive for another 60 years?

Perhaps, but not necessarily as a Jewish state.

How long do you think the first set of non-Jews will go on defending Israel from the second lot and from their very wealthy and numerous kinsmen? In other words, Zionism has only replaced and repositioned the question of anti-Semitism. For me, the Israeli family is not the alternative to the diaspora. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Norman Farrell
4.1
by Norman Farrell - Oct. 1, 2008

Hitchens, while always thought provoking and fun to read, takes an argument in so many directions that clarity is ever at risk. He considers whether Zionism has made Jews more or less safe and then recounts how Jews hold answers on all sides of that question. Hitchens also tries to cover all sides with his own conclusions. He doubts that a Jewish state will exist in Palestine in 100 years but surmises that a state for Jews may exist. Hitchens writes that Zionism has not solved anti-Semitism but merely repositioned it. He sees modern Israel not as an alternative to the diaspora but a portion of it - the part, ironically, that depends on non-Jews for protecting it from danger. To Hitchens, promulgation of anti-Semitism foreshadows unfailing barbarism and collapse and modern practitioners in the Middle East ensure lasting peace will not come to Israelis. Hitchens suggests that Jews have not convincingly argued for Israel and little time is left for non-Zionists, Hitchens for one, to be convinced to support unreservedly the nation’s defence.

See All Reviews »

Norman's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »