How the military analyst program controlled news coverage: in the Pentagon's own words

On the question of whether the Pentagon maintained an illegal covert domestic propaganda program -- and on the broader question of whether the American media's political coverage is largely shaped and controlled by the U.S. Government -- I don't believe it's possible to obtain more conclusive evidence than this:

These are excepts from a memorandum sent on January 14, 2005 -- just before President Bush was to be inaugurated for his second term -- ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - May 10, 2008 - 1:32 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - May 10, 2008 - 1:45 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jim Lang
3.7
by Jim Lang - Oct. 1, 2008

This blog provides quotes from military officers demonstrating their desire to use analysts to manipulate news coverage and public opinion. The quotes presented are damning enough but the article then slips into the mode of attributing motives, e.g., to the press, which is so common in right wing and left wing blogs.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Ben Ross
5.0
by Ben Ross - Oct. 1, 2008

The most important story of the spring 2008, Clearly reveals how GWB/ DOD attempt (present tense) to hollow out the core of American freedom by suborning the media and the media's tactic complicity.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Bruce T Brown
4.1
by Bruce T Brown - Oct. 1, 2008

This article documents the abuse of Rumsfeld selling Iraq.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.7
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has modest journalistic merit. It is poorly sourced, using only items that support the author's ideological position. Only someone with limited knowledge of the media would doubt that most major media are slanted toward the left; every major academic study (Harvard, Chicago, UCLA-Missouri) has come to that conclusion. The author's counterfactual bias thus lowers the value of this piece considerably.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
2.0
Fairness
3.5
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.2
Style
2.0
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!