Supreme Court justices question campaign finance law

The US Supreme Court appears poised to pare back campaign finance reform measures that sharply restrict corporate expenditures during federal campaigns.

At issue in a special hearing Wednesday was whether the court should strike down two legal precedents that bar corporations from spending their general treasury funds on political speech during campaign season. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Christian Science Monitor

See All Reviews »

Review

Jim Lang
4.6
by Jim Lang - Sep. 15, 2009

This is a well written, accurate, reasonably complete and dispassionate piece of journalism.

Allowing corporate money to flow into the election process would be a mistake. In this case, as in many others, the "constitutional" argument is really one of ideology rather than the language of the constitution. With all the evidence we have of the detrimental effect that the need for candidates to raise money has on the processes of government, we need to be working on getting money out of the election process.

See All Reviews »

Jim's Rating

Overall
4.6

Very good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.6
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »