The Story Behind the Story

With journalists being laid off in droves, savvy political operatives have stepped eagerly into the breach. What’s most troubling is not that TV-news producers mistake their work for journalism, which is bad enough, but that young people drawn to journalism increasingly see no distinction between disinterested reporting and hit-jobbery. The very smart and capable young men (more on them in a moment) who actually dug up and initially posted the Sotomayor ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Lynn R. Willis
4.7
by Lynn R. Willis - Sep. 16, 2009

This piece is excellent, albeit lengthy, and a reader must stay with it to find it’s main message. In the end, however, it's worth the read. Stated differently, the title of this piece could be "What Price Internet," because it shows how the demise of investigative journalism, largely at the hands of the internet (this isn't news), has opened fertile ground for folks driven by political (or whatever) ideology to comb the databases for anything, taken in our out of context, that will further their cause. Reporting done by these folks, who don't know the first thing about journalism, becomes all about winning for their side and not at all about educating or informing the populace; in short, narcissism and demagoguery running amok under the mantle of “truth-seeking,” fed by the news media's need for something to put on the air, hang the cost.

This piece describes how the featured blogger cherry-picked tasty morsels from Justice Sotomayor's off-the-record recorded remarks and broadcast them with never a thought about asking someone who knows the law about their context. And all of the TV news networks lapped it up. All of this is inexcusable. Sadly, it's also not isolated to this particular case. The inmates clearly are now in charge of our asylum,...

See All Reviews »

Lynn's Rating

Overall
4.7

Very good
from 20 answers
Quality
4.6
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »