Unfair and unreasonable opinion piece about Obama's comments on why he doesn't wear flag pins. The author claims that Obama is trying to 'rewrite history' by citing two different reasons for not wearing pins. I see no evidence of that being the case, and this partisan piece appears to merely try to discredit a candidate on a relatively unimportant issue, by distorting the facts to make an unnecessary point. Could we get the public discourse back on track, so we can address substantive issues instead?

This flag pin nonsense exemplifies the mindless flagwaving and benighted attempts to enforce political orthodoxy that seems to blind so many boneheads. On top of it, this author tries to read into a statement a slant that is not in the statement. Barf.

Obvious bias and mostly meaningless twisting of unrelated remarks.

. . . signifying nothing . . .

It is not even journalism.

This short opinion piece has considerable merit, as the author has done careful research to make his point. The exact wording used by Senator Obama is brought up by the author, who is well known for his thorough research and the accuracy of his pieces.

Too much hot air with extreme bias... Do not waste our time here!

this is not journalism. twisting and manouvering with one intention to discredit someone can not be called journalism