Why Bother?

For us to wait for legislation or technology to solve the problem of how we're living our lives suggests we're not really serious about changing -- something our politicians cannot fail to notice. They will not move until we do. Indeed, to look to leaders and experts, to laws and money and grand schemes, to save us from our predicament represents precisely the sort of thinking -- passive, delegated, dependent for solutions on specialists -- that helped get ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Shakthi Sivanathan (t)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Sci/Tech, Living, Extra
Topics: Environment
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 22, 2008 - 12:12 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

A change from the many policy and economics oriented articles on the environment that make their way to NewsTrust, this opinion piece is a nice read about personal accountability.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Gary Clark
3.8
by Gary Clark - Oct. 1, 2008

I like the way Michael Pollan puts his finger on several crucial problems with our responses to environmental issues. We must cultivate a culture of doing what is good for us both individually and collectively. Our fragmented society creates a sense of helplessness, of wanting to call in "an expert", when gratification with our own efforts is what's missing. As to the efficacy of growing our own food, look to the Victory Gardens of WW II that produced millions of pounds of produce. Gardening supply businesses are expanding at a rapid rate, so the message may be spurring a rebirth of that spirit.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Donica Mensing
4.1
by Donica Mensing - Oct. 1, 2008

Michael Pollan makes a strong moral and environmental case for individual responsibility in addressing global climate change. His recommended start: home grown food. My favorite passage: "to look to leaders and experts, to laws and money and grand schemes, to save us from our predicament represents precisely the sort of thinking — passive, delegated, dependent for solutions on specialists — that helped get us into this mess in the first place."

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.4
Information
3.4
Sourcing
2.8
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
2.7
Context
3.6
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
2.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!