Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction

Bentham Science Publications - Open Civil Engineering Journal by Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley | Apr. 19, 2008 (Review)

Abstract: Reports by FEMA and NIST lay out the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. In this Letter, we wish to set a foundation for productive discussion and understanding by focusing on those areas where we find common ground with FEMA and NIST, while at the same time countering several popular myths about the WTC collapses. Full Story »

Posted by Erik Larson

See All Reviews »

View

5.0

by Erik Larson - Oct. 1, 2008

These 14 points, which NIST and FEMA assert as fact, actually contradict their own explanations of the destruction of the world trade center towers- read and see for yourself if you agree. The 5 authors are known for challenging the official explanations and advancing the theory that explosives brought down WTC 1, 2 & 7. In any case, now that the article has been published in a mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific journal, there will be debate in the scientific community about the meaning of these 14 points.

Erik posted this story.