Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction

Bentham Science Publications - Open Civil Engineering Journal by Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley | Apr. 19, 2008 (Review)

Abstract: Reports by FEMA and NIST lay out the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. In this Letter, we wish to set a foundation for productive discussion and understanding by focusing on those areas where we find common ground with FEMA and NIST, while at the same time countering several popular myths about the WTC collapses. Full Story »

Posted by Erik Larson

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech
Topics: Science
Member Tags: NIST, World Trade Center, Dr. Steven Jones, destruction, controlled demolition
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 10+
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 10+
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 2
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 7-9
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Erik Larson - Apr 19, 2008 - 10:15 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Erik Larson (review), Fabrice Florin (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Apr 20, 2008 - 9:48 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.0
 by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Erik Larson
5.0
 by Erik Larson - Oct. 1, 2008

These 14 points, which NIST and FEMA assert as fact, actually contradict their own explanations of the destruction of the world trade center towers- read and see for yourself if you agree. The 5 authors are known for challenging the official explanations and advancing the theory that explosives brought down WTC 1, 2 & 7. In any case, now that the article has been published in a mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific journal, there will be debate in the scientific community about the meaning of these 14 points.

Erik posted this story.
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.8

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

Sci/Tech | Science
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!