Is "clean coal" possible?

The "clean coal" debate and the climate change crisis Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 6, 2008 - 9:43 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.6
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

Informative overview of different approaches to 'clean coal' energy, such as carbon capture and sequestration technology. This short video segment explains the facts clearly and intelligently. However, I am concerned about the choice of sources for this piece, which seem to favor progressive viewpoints -- no representative from the coal industry is represented in this report, and the footage is largely from Greenpeace. That said, I found this story helpful in getting a better understanding of some of the challenges and opportunities we face in addressing this important issue.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The story is good, but much too short to cover the complexities, urgency, and alternatives available. Central solar thermal steam plants, distributed photo-voltaic solar, wind, geothermal, and conservation are all essentially carbon free and need subsidies now that must be taken away from carbon emitting energy sources. The effects of injecting carbon dioxide and carbonic acid into the ground and water table may present an unknown negative effect.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.7
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a resonably good story that points the difficulty of resonable discusssion. Two of the three "experts" seem unwilling to consider this alternative. This in spite of the fact that the alternatives they favor are equally untried and at least as costly.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Mike LaBonte
2.9
by Mike LaBonte - Oct. 1, 2008

Some of the shots of power plants are deceptive, because most of the "smoke" is actually water vapor from cooling towers. It is unbalanced in that the 3 viewpoints given point out the downsides of coal. However, I must admit there are not many people they could interview for the opposing view, who could supply credible evidence. The coal ad is the only vestige of that viewpoint. I think the prediction about how long it would take to develop carbon sequestration is shaky, and could have been rebutted.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Graham Abernathy
4.3
by Graham Abernathy - Oct. 1, 2008

Global warming is the premier problem for the world today, transcending our own national politics in importance. I am particularly frustrated. I retired from an engineering career over a decade ago and am by now hopelessly behind the times as to the current state of technology. I am loathe, however to accept an update from a Coal industry ad. Sequestering CO2, however that might be accomplished doesn’t eliminate it but merely “stores” it. How is this a solution?

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.5
Information
3.8
Sourcing
3.7
Style
3.8
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.7
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!