Interesting perspective on John McCain's recent statements that Al Qaeda is being trained by the Iranians, which wasn't challenged by the mainstream press to the degree that itshould. Jay Rosen provides a thoughtful analysis on the bizarre relationship that the news media often forms with charismatic politicians like McCain, even when their statements fly in the face of factual evidence.

That McCain gets a free pass from the media is yet another instance of managed news. All media ownership in America has been centralized during the Bush administration under the control of six corporations—every one headed by an ultra conservative CEO. Since there is an excellent chance neocons’ eight-year frenzy at the trough is endangered, the word is out: McCain, yes; Obama and Clinton, no. McCain’s gaffe about terrorism was repeated four times over two days. Yet the media excuse it with the usual transparent justifications ranging from he misspoke to a senior moment. Just what we need as a president: an over-the-hill war monger with senior moments about things like terrorism.

well thought out theory, well presented. Keep telling the same lie...apologize for the mistake, most times, and what gets remembered? I did not know that journalist were in the banking bizz.

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. Much of it is comprised of quotes from other publications. Its main premise is not supported by any facts. Indeed, Senator McCain was absolutely correct about Iran supporting Al Queda. Hundreds of thousands of arms and munitions from Iran have been captured in Iraq. And when is it wrong for politicians to talk with reporters? The enitre premise of the article does not make any sense.