This is an adequate report for someone who isn't particularly interested in the details; it tells you what happened in simple terms. It doesn't do justice to the work's detractors. It makes them sound silly and alarmist, and it doesn't give due consideration to the actual possible negative repercussions.

Fascinating report about a major scientific breakthrough: the largest piece of DNA created by a computer. This story provides a factual overview of Craig Venter's accomplishment, with good context on synthetic genomics, including perspectives of other researchers. This $40 million research project could lead to a variety of useful applications, such as new vaccines or food substances -- but is also raising ethical concerns, such as the possible use of this technique to create bioweapons.

Better explains the science behind this this that the New York Times, but doesn't offer as many scientific perspectives. I recommend reading both the Times and Guardian stories.

I found myself craving more detail as to the science behind this unprecedented development. Nevertheless it is a good introduction to the topic and its ethical ramifications.

This is breaking news of monumental proportions if verified. The article points to what will surely be a substantial ethical debate.