Wiretapping's true danger

History says we should worry less about privacy and more about political spying.

But focusing on the privacy of the average Joe in this way obscures the deeper threat that warrantless wiretaps poses to a democratic society. Without meaningful oversight, presidents and intelligence agencies can -- and repeatedly have -- abused their surveillance authority to spy on political enemies and dissenters.

The original FISA law was passed in 1978 after a thorough congressional investigation headed by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Extra
Member Tags: political spying, political wiretapping, politicalized prosecution, blackmail
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Mar 16, 2008 - 8:35 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia L'Herrou
3.6
by Patricia L'Herrou - Oct. 1, 2008

if the legal scholars (one quoted here) are right, the 4th amendment was primarily to protect political dissent, the new FISA bill will be a vital part of our democracy if it, in its final form, reflects that. there are many examples here of how domestic spying has been used over and over to bring down, put down and otherwise maim those who disagreed with those in power. while the author doesn't describe this bill or what aspects are necessary for that function, in this era of secrecy and imbalance of power in our government this is an important warning.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The criminal politicalization of the justice department provides a backdrop for this story that greatly increases it's immediacy and relevance. It would surprise me very greatly if this administration has not already grossly abused their wiretap accesses and engaged in politically motivated wiretapping of political opponents. And they can blackmail those whom they have not yet exposed, including those in their own party whom they want to keep in lockstep. Potential evidence of this is suspected to be the reason bush has irrationally insisted on telecom retroactive immunity, do avoid discovery proceedings that might lead to his impeachment.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
3.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!