Marriage isn't the half of it

Unmarried couples of any sexual orientation, single parents and their children, extended families -- and really, anyone who forms relationships of economic and emotional interdependence that aren't marriage -- deserve laws that value their needs and commitments. Early gay-rights advocates were part of a chorus of voices that supported diverse family structures. This week's push for equality in access to marriage should not make us complacent about the ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Jones

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Veronica Barlee
4.5
by Veronica Barlee - Oct. 1, 2008

well-written and informative overview on how family structures have changed and questioning outdated assumptions.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Josh Cohen
4.9
by Josh Cohen - Oct. 1, 2008

One of the problems here is that Marriage has been associated with the government's requirement of the registration of a religious event. Whether or not a religious organization "recognizes" associations between believers and non-believers, blacks and whites, men and women, or any other group, or not, should not be confused with the State's responsibility of treating it's citizens without bias. How's about changing the definition of "Marriage" to be a religious construct (just as "Baptism," "Confirmation," or "Bar Mitzvah" are) and move the fight to its rightful domain: YOUR church!

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fred Gatlin
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 1, 2008

An excellent commentary. People are truly individuals we are not all the same. Even if offended by someone else's choice does not give us the right to deny or limit.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Jackson
4.2
by James Jackson - Oct. 1, 2008

Polikoff agues that gay marriage just exposes a problem that many (perhaps most) Californians face. The one-size-fits-all marriage contract fits almost no one very well.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Robert Vermeers
4.9
by Robert Vermeers - Oct. 1, 2008

Even though this article doesn't list all the issues regarding domestic relations it gives enough examples to form a picture of a broader spectrum. I believe that anyone who tends towards prejudice against domestic partnerships should open their minds and realize there are reasons that instituting more rights for non-traditional unions is not a threat to traditional unions.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Beth Jones
3.8
by Beth Jones - Oct. 1, 2008

So often this issue is reduced to righteous blather about the "institution of marriage", like it's the Fort Knox of Societal Norms. This op-ed brings up the more relevant points about the separate and unequal status accorded to those who for whatever reason don't or can't fulfill the stodgy requirements for a marriage "club membership".

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.0
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The article includes measured and thoughtful examination of issues and sub-issues. Worthy of a tour. Tangentially, the video "Inlaws and Outlaws" has an engaging look at the underlying humanity in love relations across all permutations of gender ( http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809864986/info ).

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 10 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
3.8
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.3
Sourcing
3.9
Style
4.2
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.4
Context
4.4
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!