Indian children crippled by uranium

Observer investigation uncovers link between dramatic rise in birth defects in Punjab and pollution from coal-fired power stations Their heads are too large or too small, their limbs too short or too bent. For some, their brains never grew, speech never came and their lives are likely to be cut short: these are the children it appears that India would rather the world did not see, the victims of a scandal with potential implications far beyond the ... Full Story »

Posted by Subramanya Sastry - via OneRiot, The Guardian (US), NewsRack (Energy)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Business, Sci/Tech, Health
Member Tags: World news, the observer, wind, nuclear, news
Stats Help
# Tweets: 4 (as of 2009-08-29)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Subramanya Sastry - Aug 29, 2009 - 6:02 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Subramanya Sastry - Aug 29, 2009 - 7:49 PM PDT
Subramanya Sastry
3.9
by Subramanya Sastry - Aug. 30, 2009

Looks like two different news articles (this one, and the other one linked) approach the same issue (children's health seriously affected by high levels of uranium in their bodies) differently .. this article attributes it to coal-fired power plans and the truthout article ascribes it to depleted uranium from the wars in afghanistan. Both articles acknowledge the other point of view. It is a little hard to figure out what the real reason is given these two conflicting claims. But, the article does a good job of highlighting the serious health problems in children because of uranium and the Indian Government and Department of Atomic Energy's efforts to cover up -- though it is unclear why.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Patricia Blochowiak
3.4
by Patricia Blochowiak - Aug. 30, 2009

Although credible journal references are hinted at, there is no information beyond the name of the journal, and no link, making tracing the sources of the information and its actual credibility impossible to assess. Addendum: I've just added a link to the Scientific American article, which has been criticized in other scientific journals. Other references criticize the wording of the SA article, but many add the dangers of mercury, arsenic, and other toxins, and we don't know how they dispose of the coal ash in India.

Seems credible. Hadn't heard about uranium in coal ash, so I would wonder whether depleted uranium weapons would be a more reasonable source of radiation.

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Jose Cazares
5.0
by Jose Cazares - Aug. 30, 2009

This story was very thorough, well researched and presented in a very scholarly way.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Patrick McGuire
5.0
by Patrick McGuire - Aug. 30, 2009

It has been extensively researched and done. My one question is have the Indian authorities been contacted?

I guess there is more than pollution of air, water, and ground. This should give notice to the rest of the world.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jim O'Connor
4.5
by Jim O'Connor - Feb. 27, 2010

This article seem to have been very well researched and very well written. A very good article

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Judith Remy Leder
4.4
by Judith Remy Leder - Sep. 1, 2009

Clear with lots of riveting particulars.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 6 reviews (32% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.4
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.1
Style
3.0
Accuracy
1.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
1.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
4.5
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
2.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Afghan War's Blowback for India's Children?

    According to a section of the researchers particularly concerned with the cases of birth deformities, Punjab may be paying with the health of its people for the wars in ...
  • Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste: Scientific American Queued

  • UNOR INC TSX-V:UNI Pending

  • Coal ash is NOT more radioactive than nuclear waste | CEJournal Pending

  • Coal's Other Major Pollutant: Mercury Pending

  • Fly ash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Pending

  • Coal waste dumps: ticking toxic time bombs | CEJournal Pending