Dishonest doctrine

A selective use of history taints the COIN manual

To wit, the most over-cited bit of nonsense from the manual is the claim that counterinsurgency warfare is only 20 percent military and 80 percent political. No analysis of this indefensible proposition occurred. It was quoted because it suited the pre-formulated argument. Full Story »

Posted by Ben Ross

See All Reviews »

Review

Rory O'Connor
2.9
by Rory O'Connor - Oct. 1, 2008

This commentary is provocative but unfocused--citing everyone from Chairman Mao to Edward Gibbon, and from the Mau Maus to the Moros, as it dissects and criticizes the new Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency manual as "deeply disturbing, both for the practical dangers it creates and for the dishonest approach employed to craft it." Still, there are some marvelous passages, as when the author says bluntly that "Entrusted with the mission of turning Iraq around, Petraeus turned out to be a marvelously focused and methodical killer..." and "Given the responsibility of command, he recognized that, when all the frills are stripped away, counterinsurgency warfare is about killing those who need killing, helping those who need help — and knowing the difference between the two (we spent our first four years in Iraq striking out on all three counts)." In some respects, I couldn't agree more!

See All Reviews »

Rory's Rating

Overall
2.9

Average
from 10 answers
Quality
2.9
Facts
2.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
More How our ratings work »