FISA Reform: The Bad Bill that Beats No Bill

The Senate bill is bipartisan -- and that's nothing to celebrate.

So, if you're a telecom, why on earth would you cooperate if the Bush administration yet again decided to resort to its constitutional power to protect the country? You might be totally sympathetic -- and the telecoms' prior patriotic service demonstrates that they are. But you'd be opening yourself up to yet another round of multibillion-dollar class-action suits. You'd have no choice but to say, "Mr. President, sorry, but you need a court order." And, ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Feb 14, 2008 - 10:38 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Ben Ross
1.0
by Ben Ross - Oct. 1, 2008

These are the irresponsible words of a criminal masquerading as a patriot. He attempt to say the laws should be broken when it suits the present administrations secret totalitarian agenda, without any convincing arguments as to why this should be so. the only part of this article worth anything at all is the title....See Russ Feingold in the blog from salon yesterday by glenn greenwald concerning WSJ coverage of same legislation...ala..http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/11/wsj/index.html

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

1.3

Bad
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
1.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
1.0
Sourcing
1.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
2.4
Recommendation
2.3
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
2.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!