Does Group Health hold answers in health-care debate?

The Obama administration last week endorsed health cooperatives like Group Health as a potential alternative to a government-run insurance plan whose aim is to create competition among insurers and slow soaring health-care costs.

even some of Group Health's most ardent admirers warn that replicating the co-op would be difficult — and replicating it quickly practically impossible. Sixty-two years after its founding, Group Health remains one of just two major health cooperatives in the nation. The other is HealthPartners of Bloomington, Minn.

Creating health co-ops, after all, could involve building or assembling new organizations from scratch, including management, ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Seattle Times

See All Reviews »

Review

Fred Gatlin
3.9
by Fred Gatlin - Aug. 29, 2009

This is an excellent description about coop health care. The key is it is a non-profit company and providers are salaried.

It is my understanding that all Blue Cross Blue Shield companies were mutual insurance companies. That means the company was owned by policy holders. Both coops and mutual companies are non-profits.

See All Reviews »

Fred's Rating

Overall
3.9

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »