How the feds stopped the states from averting the lending mess

Georgia understood that impeding the capital flow to subprime loans might raise the cost of borrowing for some state residents--those who, for one reason or another, had poor credit but could and would repay high-priced loans. But Georgia judged that this was more than balanced by protection for its most vulnerable from the scourge of predatory lending and the wrenching costs associated with overpayment and eventual foreclosure. New York, New Jersey, and ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Bruce Sims
3.8
by Bruce Sims - Oct. 1, 2008

The author did a good job on a complicated subject; he might have pointed out that the Comptroller of the OCC has to be the one issuing a regulation and that it is a political position. he could have also pointed out the OCC's charter more specifically than 'safety and soundness' by quoting from the OCC itself "Issue rules and regulations governing bank investments, lending, and other practices" And pointed out how the OCC has CRA (community reinvestment act) responsibilities: http://www.occ.treas.gov/crainfo.htm http://www.occ.treas.gov/cra/limited.htm The statement "state legislatures gave up" would also indicate the story is larger than the space allotted the writer by his editors and that ,perhaps, is why the statement "The subprime catastrophe might have been more like a mini-crisis" I find inadequate closing os the article. Especially in view of it being the FED whose responsibility it is to "regulate the supply of money and credit to the economy."

See All Reviews »

Bruce's Rating

Overall
3.8

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
3.7
Facts
3.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »