How the feds stopped the states from averting the lending mess

Georgia understood that impeding the capital flow to subprime loans might raise the cost of borrowing for some state residents--those who, for one reason or another, had poor credit but could and would repay high-priced loans. But Georgia judged that this was more than balanced by protection for its most vulnerable from the scourge of predatory lending and the wrenching costs associated with overpayment and eventual foreclosure. New York, New Jersey, and ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Jim Filby
4.9
by Jim Filby - Oct. 1, 2008

Very well done. Direct citation of public documents (at least 8) to support the premise that GA, NY, NJ, and NM tried, in concert with AARP to craft model legislation to curb lending practices with sub-prime mortgages and were blocked by the lenders lobbying efforts. Clearly the states were ahead of the game here and only the OCC at the federal level was able to cause them to bypass correcting this environment of greed. The sad thing was pointed out that GA actually removed their enacted law to allow there state chartered banks in on the action. Too bad they did not protect them from this mess - it may have helped bring some sanity to the process.

See All Reviews »

Jim's Rating

Overall
4.9

Very good
from 7 answers
Quality
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »