Since when does one lose an election for the delegates in a state primary when one wins more delegates than one's opponent? The story claims that Obama lost by six votes in the popular race but won one more delegate than Clinton. So why does the headline indicate that he lost. This is more of the bad reporting that has left the electorate so poorly informed. Actually at this point Obama has more elected delegates than Clinton. He won more in Iowa, They tied in New Hampshire and he won one more in Nevada. If one counts superdelegates Clinton is leading but those are not discussed in this article. Nor do they always stay with a candidate as John Dean learned four years ago.