Obama needs to add substance to message

If Barack Obama thought his message of "new politics" would carry him to victory without some retooling following his loss in New Hampshire, his popular-vote defeat in yesterday's Nevada caucuses might have convinced him otherwise.

After the New Hampshire primary, Obama and his supporters chose to look at the bright side: They had won the Iowa caucuses by a decisive margin and had come within three points of Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire. Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero

See All Reviews »

Review

Linda Maloney
2.1
by Linda Maloney - Oct. 1, 2008

It's fine, so far as it goes. That Obama needs to add more substance is a given. But this story, like most of the MSM coverage, suffers from two-candidate myopia. John Edwards, as just about everyone concedes, has been the leader, for at least a year now, in promoting ideas and programs of real substance. But his ideas get no coverage (until they're adopted by one of the "two candidates"!), with the result that 25 percent of respondents to last week's NY Times/CBS poll said they "didn't know enough" about him to make a choice. (The corresponding numbers for Clinton and Obama were 2 and 8 respectively.) It takes ideas, yes. It also takes somebody paying attention.

See All Reviews »

Linda's Rating

Overall
2.1

Poor
from 7 answers
Quality
1.9
Fairness
3.0
Information
2.0
Sourcing
2.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »