Perilous Journalism in the Persian Gulf

Uncritical coverage of Strait of Hormuz incident

George W. Bush's goal of elevating the Iran threat (New York Times, 1/8/08) got a major boost last week from the news media, who failed to question the Pentagon's alarmist account of an encounter between U.S. and Iranian boats. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics, Business, Media
Member Tags: Newspapers have wised up but TV News is still stagnant.
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jan 16, 2008 - 3:46 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Bruce Sims
4.3
by Bruce Sims - Oct. 1, 2008

FAIR does an excellent job of providing good journalism on many different subjects.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.1
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The article takes big corporate media to task for lazy and reckless reporting of the Strait of Hormuz incident. The cases of media fecklessness are well documented. The article did not pick up controversies regarding the laws of territorial waters and naval law along with questions of whether the US operations were indeed technically illegal, depending upon exactly where they were located.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Francis Scalzi
4.9
by Francis Scalzi - Oct. 1, 2008

By now this story is old - at least to those of us who have bothered to track it - but the vast majority of the public did not, so the fradulent Pentagon version is still out there despite rebuttals in two major newspapers. In fact, our White House already passed on a complaint to the Iranian government about the incident - - also timed to coincide with Bush's visit to the Near East. Most of the public gets its news on TV. If CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX, MSNBC, and the rest were to retract the story, reveal the Pentagon/Defense Department lies, and correct the false impression they first amplified, we might finally hope that they are beginning to retreat from their White House biases. But that's not what we have come to expect.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.3
Information
4.7
Sourcing
4.3
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
4.0
Context
4.3
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
2.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!