Interesting but there are lots of claims here that need to be proved, not just repeated. By following the link to the original Time of London article I got a little more clarity but it still feels like more conspiracy theory. But the, just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.

I need to find the Sunday Times article referred to....this is not the first time we have heard of Sibel Edmonds....a very strange grouping of data....more info is need to connect dots.

When Congressional figures such as Henry Waxman and Patrick Leahy are aware of Sibel Edmunds allegations but REFUSE to hold hearings and when the Bush Administration tries to silence her claiming 'state secrets', you KNOW something is rotten in our government. This should be a headline story in the U.S. but the mass media is owned by those who do not wish to have their 'boat' rocked.

In the first sentence a link to the original story is provided. Sibel Edmonds has been attempting to tell her story in the U.S. media since 2002 and been blatantly ignored. Last summer going so far as to offer it in its entirety to any major media outlet, only to get no takers. Brad Freidman has been coving this topic since its inception. His latest: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5527#more-5527 Since the government can't and won't refute her claims they deny her request for hearings and slap a "States Secrets" label hoping to make her disappear. The U.S. "Liberal" media is all to happy to help.

This opinion piece does not report anything not already widely circulated through as major newspaper article. So there is no sourcing or journalistic effort involved. It reads like yet another far right opinion piece about the September 11 attacks. I will not attempt to analyze the inconsistencies and strange claims in the piece.