Move to Impeach Cheney Gains Support in Congress

The issues at hand are too serious to ignore, including credible allegations of abuse of power that if proven may well constitute high crimes and misdemeanors under our constitution. Full Story »

Posted by Andy Jamieson
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 5
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 2
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 5
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Andy Jamieson - Jan 2, 2008 - 1:54 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Jan 2, 2008 - 2:40 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Rebecca Hale
3.3
by Rebecca Hale - Oct. 1, 2008

This is important to follow because deciding where to allocate assets in government is We, the People's job, right? The administration is spending billions of dollars on the embassy in Iraq, for example. Obviously time, money and energy are never truly in short supply, when willpower is brought to bear on the situation and the need is percieved of as imperative. If having known war criminals as our paid leaders is not a real big deal, then the television brainwashing in this country must be even more effective than I had ever realized.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Andy Jamieson
4.2
by Andy Jamieson - Oct. 1, 2008

Good article about who is working on impeachment. Well sourced. Even quotes the White House response.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The move to impeach cheney and bush has wide-spread support across the country. The corporate controlled press and the legislators dependent upon business political contributions to get elected are loath to stand up for the impeachment duties of their elected office. After impeachment these people should be given a fair criminal trial and spend the rest of their lives in jail. They have fowled the nest of democracy.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.3
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has no journalistic merit. It is unbalanced and the authors are uninformed. The cluelessness of the author is evident when he states that Clinton was impeached "over a sex act with a White House intern". He was impeached for lying to a court, and paid a $900,000 fine and lost his license to practice law for several years as a reult of his perjury. The ignorance of the author is clear when he provides no historical context. Would he have advaocated impeachment of FDR in 1940 for far more serious crimes/ Or the eaually imfamous Woodrow Wilson who jailed hundreds of Socialists during World War I. No journalist merit here.

See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
2.7
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.4
Sourcing
3.4
Style
3.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
2.3
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.4
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!