Philosophy for kids

Teaching children the art of collaborative philosophical inquiry brings them persistent, long-term cognitive benefits, according to psychologists in Scotland. Full Story »

Posted by Autumn Carlson
Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech, Education
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Autumn Carlson - Jan 1, 2008 - 8:13 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Julian Friedland - Jan 1, 2008 - 9:21 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Julian Friedland
4.1
by Julian Friedland - Oct. 1, 2008

Brief report but important. Interesting study with significant sample. Of course this should be obvious. I'm sure teaching them music would have similar advantages. But perhaps not for Socratic learning. One more reason for introducing required philosophy in American public schools as has been done all over Europe, most recently in British A Levels, i.e. high school. And those students come out way ahead of ours on average, though an educated citizenry is much more difficult to govern and/or control.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dwight Rousu
3.8
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The story provides an interesting alternative to no child's behind left, which teaches how to take tests against a corporate curricula, and threatens teachers and schools to "motivate" them. This article brings to mind a favorite saying: Education should be the opening of a spring, not the digging of a well. The study is promising.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Autumn Carlson
4.0
by Autumn Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Patricia Blochowiak
3.2
by Patricia Blochowiak - Oct. 1, 2008

This presents evidence supporting the theory that asking children to think encourages them to think. It also suggests that they don't forget how to think over the next few years. How wonderful. How sad that it's necessary to remind people that memorizing isn't everything. The article isn't exciting, though, but there are good links.

See Full Review » (3 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
4.5
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
4.0
Context
3.3
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!