When a big corporate media outlet claims to be fact checking, one should be on guard about the selectivity and biases that may be present in their fact checking. Their reputation is so tarnished by their love of bush and the right wing that a rehab program should be undertaken and documented. In this case, it looks like the author arbitrarily felt the need to point the finger at both parties, and the examples he presents from democrats seem less serious and counter-evidence to the claims is very lightly documented. In particular, for Edwards, the number of jobs lost due to the so-called free trade agreements has never been accurately tracked and reported, as the clintons and bushies do not want anybody aware of the havoc that these egregious agreements have caused. There was probably close accounting of the corporate campaign contributions. The fact-checking subject is important and it is good to have a reporting effort if it can be balanced.