Did Reporters Get Born Yesterday?

The dumbest political controversy this week, a prize that one wins with some difficulty, comes unsurprisingly from the Boston Globe. Michael Kranish found it necessary to breathlessly report that John McCain used a proverb that is so well-known that it has probably appeared on tens of thousands of blogs before yesterday. Somehow, however, Kranish and an unnamed reporter on McCain's beat managed to turn it into a nasty personal attack on Mitt Romney: Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero

See All Reviews »

Review

Beth Wellington
1.5
by Beth Wellington - Oct. 1, 2008

This author's readable style provides more heat than light, as he preaches to his choir. I credit him with providing a link to the Globe, which said, in full, after the introduction about McCain’s banter, the reaction and his response: "The moment encapsulated McCain's day on the campaign trail, during which he attended several town hall-style meetings attended by overflowing audiences of several hundred people. He reveled in the large crowds, which he said reminded him of his surge before his 2000 primary win, while also wrestling with an array of charges against him arriving over the television airwaves and via email messages. He was caustic and confident, cracking jokes in his trademark style as traveled from Dover to Merrimack to Manchester while Romney and other Republican rivals were campaigning in Iowa." The pig comment does appear to be caustic and confident (note the Globe did not shade here by using a pejorative like arrogant) and jokey in the same way as the "Bomb,bomb, bomb Iran" lyric sung by McCain to the tune of the Beach Boy's Barbara Ann. The latter may reflect less gravitas. I just can't see the Globe’s entry as the MSM being dumb or even playing gotcha. Rather, it seems the blogger did so. Or as they say, "You can put lipstick on a pig..." Oh, and I can't be sure, without knowing the search terms, but a search on "some of the words" often yields up an elevated count including a lot of dross.

(comment refers to full article)

I’m not sure how this can be improved and still retain the author’s intent. The Buckley piece from the National Review which I’ve cited might be called out for setting up a straw dog, in that the question he poses to Edwards might be easily answered by Edwards providing examples of his specific policies, but the point he raises is interesting. It applies to the current story: “candidates were all disposed to talk about their own accomplishments (and their dreams of great ventures only they could launch), but something fed by gentility, brotherhood, or fear kept the candidates from enumerating the weaknesses of the others. Just wouldn’t do it.” In hsort, they, like McCain didn’t want to get into that pig fight.

See All Reviews »

Beth's Rating

Overall
1.5

Poor
from 14 answers
Quality
1.6
Facts
1.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
1.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
1.0
Balance
1.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
1.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
1.0
More How our ratings work »