Republicans, religion and the triumph of unreason

How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality?

This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy world isn't new; it's only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed – as one Republican congressman put it – ... Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie

See All Reviews »

Review

Chris Finnie
4.5
by Chris Finnie - Aug. 19, 2009

So many good quotes that I had a really hard time picking just one. Hari nails both U.S. political parties and the U.S. media--the Republicans for their refusal to accept reality-based policies, the Democrats for letting them get away with it, and the media for abdicating their responsibility to call a fact a fact and delusion just that.

They are taught from a young age that it is good to have “faith” – which is, by definition, a belief without any evidence to back it up. You don’t have “faith” that Australia exists, or that fire burns: you have evidence. You only need “faith” to believe the untrue or unprovable.

I have no quarrel with faith. There are some things all of us take on faith. I have a problem when people try to substitute in areas where it doesn’t belong. I’d like my doctor to be reasonably sure the medicine he gives me will do more good than harm, for example.

This kind of mania can’t be co-opted: it can only be overruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people or the greediest constituencies.

Here Hari echoes the liberal backlash that is just now starting in the U.S. health care debate. Democrats so want to remove the “kick me” sign we’ve worn for too long.

There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it.

It seems to me that herein lies the essence of leadership. You have to be willing to anger special interests in order to forward the greater good for the greatest number.

However strange it seems, the Republican Party really is spinning off into a bizarre cult who believe Barack Obama is a baby-killer plotting to build death panels for the grannies of America. Their new slogan could be – shrill, baby, shrill.

And I love it when they say, “Well it was okay when you said things like this about George Bush.” While I often wanted to banish Dick Cheney to Siberia, I would never have considered bringing a loaded weapon to a personal appearance. Nor did I ever hear any of my far left-wing friends suggest painting signs, carrying tombstones, calling names, or bringing guns to anybody’s appearance. We argued they were wrong, we worked to defeat them, and we sometimes held noisy protests to try to attract the media to our issues. We asked for impeachment. But I don’t remember any personal threats—even after we believed they stole two elections.

See All Reviews »

Chris's Rating

Overall
4.5

Very good
from 15 answers
Quality
4.5
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Expertise
1.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »