The Bias In What Gets Left Out

Pew Research Center issued a stinging indictment on Wednesday regarding the press coverage of Iraq this year, one that shows a subtle but clear editorial bias. The news media gave plenty of attention to the war in Iraq when they could show it as a failing enterprise, with half of all their coverage focusing on anecdotal stories of violence. When the success of General David Petraeus made even that coverage difficult, media outlets simply stopped reporting ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Dec 23, 2007 - 7:58 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Mark Monday
2.1
by Mark Monday - Oct. 1, 2008

This is the usual pap -- heard from right, left and middle -- that "the (fill in the blank media) don't report about (fill in the blank) because they are biased." Usually the second blank is filled in with the words "good news about..." This is a continuing issue and based on a total misunderstanding about journalism. Let's go to Journalism 101: *Journalists write news stories about conflict or human interest *Every so often journalists write a "situationer" or "analysys" piece that will cover the progression of a situation, perhaps from bad to good. *Despite all claims to the contrary, conflict and human interest pieces are what sells newspapers or garners advertising space/air time. "Good news" doesn't sell. Until I cut ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an important issue, and deserves a strong, well-researched analysis. Morrissey points out the issue, but his analysis strikes me as superficial. He doesn't entertain other reasons for the decline of reporting on Iraq (the Presidential Campaign, for example).

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.6

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.5
Facts
2.0
Fairness
2.5
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
2.5
Accuracy
1.0
Balance
1.5
Context
2.5
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!