Bush's Last Laugh: Whether Moron Or Liar, Who Cares?

Our Great Debate -- or what should be a great debate, one leading to a great resolution -- is nothing but a piddling parlor game. Full Story »

Posted by Melva Hackney
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Member Tags: Public Meltdown
Stats Help
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Melva Hackney - Dec 8, 2007 - 10:10 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Paul Graves
1.4
by Paul Graves - Oct. 1, 2008

This blog post is a classic case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Technically this is an editorial, not a new story, and thus is held to different standards. But serves as an unintended window into P.M. Carpenter's soul. Let me ask three questions: If Bush is so stupid, why does he consistently get his way? If he's merely a puppet, why wouldn't his "puppetmaster" simply run for - and win - the Presidency? And if truth is so important to Carpenter, why isn't he going crazy at Hillary Clinton's candidacy?

The latest presidential spectacle will someday have historians in stitches. From the bowels of the Bush 43 Presidential Library, one will hear the raucous laughter of ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Melva Hackney
5.0
by Melva Hackney - Oct. 1, 2008

I deem this piece important because it is Reality. It begs the question of whether any future president will voluntarily give up the unlimited, illegal Power that Bush and Cheney have hijacked. Democracy, as America has known and taken for granted, does not exist today. The Constitution, Bill of Rights, National and International laws have been trashed. Will things be restored to the pre-Bush/Cheney reign??

See Full Review » (3 answers)
Rory O'Connor
1.5
by Rory O'Connor - Oct. 1, 2008

An anti-Bush blog screed.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Greg Kopczynski
3.3
by Greg Kopczynski - Oct. 1, 2008

As an editorial, I liked this piece. Though some reviewers suggest this is an anti-Bush rant, it is not. It's a rant against the current group of Bush-policy "enablers" in Congress (i.e. Pelosi and Co.). It is in many ways a reflection of voter frustration with a Congress that seems more unwilling than unable to provide the checks and balances that voters *thought* would finally return to the Capital after the 2006 elections. Don't read it expecting to learn anything new. Read it with the hope that *maybe* the Democrats will figure out just how badly they are shooting themselves in the foot for the 2008 elections. Bush & Co. are setting them up to have nothing to show for their two years in power other than pork barrel spending. ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.2

Poor
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.1
Facts
1.5
Fairness
1.7
Information
1.7
Sourcing
1.5
Style
1.0
Balance
1.0
Context
2.7
Popularity
2.7
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
2.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »