Bush Goes Private to Spy on You

The Bush administration is launching a new government agency that will rely heavily on private security contractors to conduct surveillance in the U.S.

A new intelligence institution to be inaugurated soon by the Bush administration will allow government spying agencies to conduct broad surveillance and reconnaissance inside the United States for the first time. Full Story »

Posted by Melva Hackney
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S.
Topics: Domestic Spying
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Melva Hackney - Dec 6, 2007 - 6:48 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Peter Henry
4.6
by Peter Henry - Oct. 1, 2008

Oh dear. What privacy rights will any of us have left in a few years? This IS INDEED important journalism. It describes how powerful satellite technology - mostly spy satellites - have proved their usefulness in national emergencies and now there are moves to allow them to be used for domestic intelligence gathering, together with private companies. One concern is, once the government decided it wants some information, does that mean it will prevent the rest of us from getting and using it? Another is, what's the interaction between government and private groups? A third is, where's the legal line between what the Government can do absent a court warrant, what a private information gathering company can do, and then share ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Melva Hackney
5.0
by Melva Hackney - Oct. 1, 2008

It is a rare politician of any Party, in any country that does not dream of being the Decider of a Dictatorship. Once established, it is very difficult to get rid of them. Civil War, anyone??

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.2
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece would be hilarious if it were not about a serious topic. The author knows nothing about surviellence in other countries: the word "London" or the abbreviation "UK" do not appear anywhere in the piece. There is no balance in the piece, nor is there much information. So the author deserves an F for total lack of knowledge of the subject.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
2.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!