Cheney's New Gambit

The stenographers of the Fawning Corporate Media (FCM) are missing the most obvious explanation for former Vice President Dick Cheney’s widely reported “disappointment” with former President George W. Bush on the issue of pardons -- self-interest. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Member Tags: Cheney
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Aug 16, 2009 - 12:49 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Aug 16, 2009 - 12:49 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.4
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Aug. 18, 2009

A disturbing article in that Bushie culprits may go free of what was basically a Bush, Cheney, and Bushies hijacking of democracy, replacing it with neo-fascism. They committed crimes against America, against the world, and against humanity. Could Obama's coolness be due to the number of Democrats also covered with neo fascist slime?

If these high crimes go uninvestigated and unpunished, democracy will be forever tainted. And America will always be considerably diminished.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.0
by Dwight Rousu - Aug. 16, 2009

Reading recently about the post-WWII Nuremberg Tribunal, I was reminded that it was the film of Nazi concentration camps that wiped the arrogant smirks off the faces of senior Nazi officials, defendants like Hermann Goering and Rudolf Hess. Bulldozers pushing corpses into open pits, bodies stacked like cordwood — the films of such atrocities had devastating effect. According to one witness, “Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel sat there, bent over and broken, mopping his lined face with a soggy ball of handkerchief.” The smirks never came back. Cheney and his associates have got to be prepared for something similar

U.S. and international laws require that Bush and Cheney be prosecuted. If Holder fails, he is breaking the law.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 7 reviews (39% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
3.5
Fairness
2.5
Information
4.3
Insight
4.4
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
2.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.5
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.2
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
2.5
Responsibility
4.2
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!