CNN Fails to mention retired gay general's endorsement of Hillary

CNN, as part of its Republican debate with YouTube, failed to mention that retired general Keith Kerr, who announced he was gay after his retirement from the Army, is a member of Hillary Clinton's "LGBT Americans For Hillary Steering Committee." Not only did General Kerr ask the question via a YouTube video, but he was also present in the audience, and got to ask the candidates for a "straight answer" (pardon the pun).

General Kerr's, whose ... Full Story »

Posted by Roland F. Hirsch
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Media
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Media and Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Roland F. Hirsch - Nov 29, 2007 - 3:17 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Linda Maloney
1.0
by Linda Maloney - Oct. 1, 2008

CNN fell all over itself apologizing to the Republicans for allowing a 43-year veteran who happens to support a Democratic candidate to ask them a question. Shocking! The reporter somehow fails to mention that CNN allowed at least one clearly Republican-biased question on the Democratic debate ("If you are elected, will my taxes go up, the way they always do when Democrats get in?"), or -- much more important -- that one of the questioners on the Democratic debate, a CNN anchor soon to have her own show, is married to a senior Republican advisor, Dan Senor. Media Matters tells all.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
David Pappas
3.8
by David Pappas - Oct. 1, 2008

Good article. Very fact based (basically quoting debate transcripts).

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
4.6
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This is another big ethical lapse for the media, and in particular CNN, allowing questions to the Republican candidates from someone known to them to be a a Democratic party activist. The article is accurate and include a quote from CNN admitting that they failed to follow even minimal ethical standards in calling on this person, which was a double ethical lapse since the debate supposedly was to be based on questions submitted in advance. Coming after a series of revelations about planted questions and allowing party activists to ask them (as happened in the last debate among Democrats), this raises a serious issue that the media need to confront promptly. The article covers the facts extremely well.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.1

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
4.5
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.3
Sourcing
3.3
Style
4.5
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
3.5
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.8
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!