Darwin's Surprise

Why are evolutionary biologists bringing back extinct deadly viruses?

Viruses reproduce rapidly and often with violent results, yet they are so rudimentary that many scientists don't even consider them to be alive. A virus is nothing more than a few strands of genetic material wrapped in a package of protein--a parasite, unable to function on its own. In order to survive, it must find a cell to infect. Only then can any virus make use of its single talent, which is to take control of a host's cellular machinery and use it to ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dale Penn
4.1
by Dale Penn - Oct. 1, 2008

Powerful article. While the ethical implications are implied, surely there are ethicists out there willing to take this on in order to provide balance to provide better balance and context. As written, it appears the foxes are guarding the hen house, which I find frightening.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
5.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

A fascinating, well written story which goes beyond Darwin and should become part of every high school science curriculum. Ironically, at the same time articles like this are taking evolution into the 21st century, groups of Americans are seriously attempting to replace a large body of scientific research and data with faith-based “Creationism”.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Bill Gordon
5.0
by Bill Gordon - Oct. 1, 2008

I am the CEO of a company in biotech. This is a great article!! It really opened my eyes to some things I didn't know that are very timely. I forwarded the link to some of my colleagues almost embarrassed that I was forwarding them something "scientific" from the New Yorker...but in this day and age you can't be too choosy where you find really good journalism. I was amazed to see it on the NewsTrust site after just discovering it yesterday in print.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jack Powers
4.6
by Jack Powers - Oct. 1, 2008

Excellent article tells how “If Charles Darwin reappeared today, he might be surprised to learn that humans are descended from viruses as well as from apes”.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Lynn Caporale
1.2
by Lynn Caporale - Oct. 1, 2008

OK but it jumps around in a disorganized way within a much larger story, and in particular slights the larger context of discovery of transposable elements [going back to Barbara McClintock]. I also was amazed, given that the transposable elements field is studded with distinguished women scientists [Members of the National Academy and Nobel Laureate](I can think of 5 in the first few seconds of reflection] that this story reinforces the idea that all of the important exciting work in science is done by ground-breaking men- indeed, the story is poorer for having omitted the work of these women. This also does not talk much about the concerns of those who worry about recombination and spread of these jumping genes. Still, I am ... More »

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Gary Clark
5.0
by Gary Clark - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an incredibly stimulating scientific piece. It makes me feel as if I understand one whit of an incredibly complex process, although I must trust the sources for authenticity.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Stephen Wilmarth
5.0
by Stephen Wilmarth - Oct. 1, 2008

Great story with terrific implications for young learners! The opportunity abounds to take this story and turn it into the kinds of questions in a classroom that can provide a "threshold" event for students who may ultimately decide to pursue careers in science and research. For teachers, this is content well-worth adding to any discipline's curriculum.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Bill White
4.6
by Bill White - Oct. 1, 2008

The two most intriguing articles I have ever read on genetics have been in the New Yorker. The first was several years ago, and explained to me how mitochondrial DNA can be used to trace how long ago two species diverged, in the context of canine behavior and genetics. The second is this one, which tells us why viruses, and retroviruses and lentiviruses in particular, have affected our evolution. There is a hint at the end about how retroviruses can explain, in large part, speciation. No other explanation has ever made sense to me about speciation, but this does. I recommend this to everyone, though people who do not believe in evolution will be even more apalled than they already are. Imagine - We are not descended just from ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
John Brothers
4.5
by John Brothers - Oct. 1, 2008

Fascinating story, which I really enjoyed. However, it didn't present any arguments from the people who might disagree with these theories regarding endogenous retroviruses, so it's not technically very balanced. So I had to give it a bit of a ding on fairness.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 14 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.4
Information
4.8
Sourcing
4.5
Style
5.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.6
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help