Republican Death Trip

“I am in this race because I don’t want to see us spend the next year re-fighting the Washington battles of the 1990s. I don’t want to pit Blue America against Red America; I want to lead a United States of America.” So declared Barack Obama in Full Story »

Posted by Kelly Garrett - via Dan Kennedy, New York Times (Opinion), AllTop, Publish2 (Politics), New York Times (Most Emailed), Opinion Source
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Health
Member Tags: health insurance and managed care, reform and reorganization, barack obama, charles grassley
Stats Help
# Diggs: 21 (as of 2009-08-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kelly Garrett - Aug 13, 2009 - 10:27 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Aug 14, 2009 - 11:33 AM PDT
Kelly Garrett
3.7
by Kelly Garrett - Aug. 14, 2009

Krugman clearly articulates his concerns over the current health care debate and offers suggestions as to how Obama might proceed.

I doubt Obama's opponents will find it persuasive, but the position is clear. Krugman sounds angry, which may turn some readers off.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Gary Clark
4.3
by Gary Clark - Aug. 14, 2009

Krugman views current Rightist attacks on Obama, via the healthcare proposals, as continuation of the irrational anti-Clinton mania "that eagerly seizes on every wild rumor manufactured by the right-wing media complex. This opposition cannot be appeased." Examples show this to be GOP strategy, which he believes only can be thwarted with "a sense of passion and outrage — passion for the goal of ensuring that every American gets the health care he or she needs, outrage at the lies and fear-mongering."

The GOP is wildly flailing in troubled waters, and will take down any who innocently swim too near.

So can Mr. Obama, who can be so eloquent when delivering a message of uplift, rise to the challenge of unreasoning, unappeasable opposition? More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (31% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.5
Relevance
4.5
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!